|
|
|
Neanderthal Extinction Hypotheses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ever
since their discovery, both the Neanderthals' place
in the human family tree and their relation to
modern Europeans have been hotly debated. At
different times they have been classified as a
separate species (Homo neanderthalensis) and as a
subspecies of Homo sapiens (Homo sapiens
neanderthalensis).
Anthropologists advanced and still advance arguments
favouring either an accelerated regional evolution
of Neanderthal towards Homo Sapiens, or
interbreeding with or replacement by anatomically
modern humans. There is no agreement on the
association of early Aurignacian culture to any
specific physical human type, including figurative
art found at Vogelherd.[1] The interpretation of the
Neanderthal Genome Project results so far vary from
a 0.1% contribution of Neanderthal to the modern
gene pool, to a genetic similarity not unlike two
extant members of one referenced population in West
Africa.[2]
The obvious anatomic differences between Neanderthal
and anatomically modern humans inspired the general
belief in two separate branches of the genus Homo,
and favoured the single-origin hypothesis in that
modern humans are not directly descended from the
Neanderthal branch. The nature of interaction and
dividing lines between Neanderthal and archaic Homo
Sapiens during the period 50,000 to 25,000 years ago
remain largely unknown.[3]. Though it has been
suggested that the late Neanderthal populations
survived in Southern Iberia, in general this area
has been considered a "cul-de-sac", playing a
passive role in human/biological evolution.[4][5]
There is considerable debate about whether
Cro-Magnon people accelerated the demise of the
Neanderthals, and many hypotheses to that extent are
currently available. |
|
|
|
Extinction
Scenarios |
Rapid extinction
Jared Diamond has suggested a scenario of violent
conflict comparable to the genocides suffered by
indigenous peoples in recent human history. Another
possibility, paralleling colonialist history, would
be a greater susceptibility to pathogens introduced
by Cro-Magnon man on the part of the Neanderthals.
Although Jared Diamond and others have specifically
mentioned Cro-Magnon diseases as a threat to
Neanderthals, this aspect of the analogy with the
contacts between colonisers and indigenous peoples
in recent history can be misleading. The distinction
arises because Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals are both
believed probably to have lived a nomadic
lifestyle,[6] [7] whereas in those genocides of the
colonial era in which differential disease
susceptibility was most significant, it resulted
from the contact between colonists with a long
history of agriculture and nomadic hunter-gatherer
peoples. Diamond argues that asymmetry in
susceptibility to pathogens is a consequence of the
difference in lifestyle, which makes it irrelevant
in the context of the analogy in which he invokes
it.
On the other hand, many Native Americans before
contact with Europeans were not nomadic, but
agriculturalists (Mayans, Iroquois, Cherokee), and
this still did not protect them from the disease
epidemics brought by Europeans (Smallpox). One
theory is that because they usually lacked large
domesticated animal agriculture, such as cows or
pigs in close contact with people (Zoonosis), they
did not develop resistance to species-jumping
diseases like Europeans had. (See also Guns, Germs,
and Steel.)[8]
Gradual extinction
However, these scenarios may be more drastic than is
required to explain a decline of Neanderthal
population over the course of some 10,000-20,000
years: even a slight selective advantage on the part
of modern humans could account for Neanderthals'
replacement on such a timescale. Gradual climatic
change as a cause of extinction is also a common
hypothesis. Speech-related theories have been
largely discredited.
The problem with a gradual extinction scenario lies
in the resolution of dating methods. There have been
claims for young Neanderthal sites, younger than
30,000 years old.[9] Even claims for
interstratifications of Neanderthal and modern human
remains have been advanced.[10] So the fact that
Neanderthals and modern humans coexisted at least
for some time seems certain. However, because of
difficulties in calibrating the C14 dates the
duration of this period is uncertain.[11]
Interaction with Cro-Magnons
Interaction may have occurred at any time along the
fringes of the Neanderthal expanse, and ultimately
anywhere they met with the Cro Magnon advance. As
for now, the expansion of the first anatomically
modern humans into Europe can't be located by
diagnostic and well-dated anatomically modern human
fossils "west of the Iron Gates of the Danube"
before 32 kya.[12] In Lagar Velho Neanderthal
skeletons of younger dating have been found with
mixed traits, in Southern Iberia.[13][14]
The genetic variation at the microcephalin gene, a
critical regulator of brain size whose
loss-of-function by damaging mutations may also
cause primary microcephaly, is claimed to be the
most compelling evidence of admixture thus far. One
type of the gene, dubbed haplogroup D having an
exceptionally high worldwide frequency (~70%), was
shown to have a remarkably young coalescence age to
its most recent common ancestor ~37,000 years ago.
The remaining types (non-D) coalesce to ~990,000
years ago, while the separation time between D and
non-D was estimated at ~1,100,000 years ago. An
evolutionary advance was assumed, even though
positive selection was never as all-decisive as to
wipe out the remaining 30% of non-D haplogroups (in
which case no introgression could have been
suggested) and as for now, a measurable genetic
advance has not been attested.[15] Both the
worldwide frequency distribution of the D allele,
exceptionally high outside of Africa but low in
sub-Saharan Africa (29%) that suggests involvement
of an archaic Eurasian population, and current
estimates of the divergence time between modern
humans and Neanderthals based on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA),
are in favor of the Neanderthal lineage as the most
likely archaic Homo population from which
introgression into the modern human gene pool took
place. [16][17]
The case for fertile reproduction recently revived
by studies that claim signs of admixture
(introgression), finding unusually deep genealogies
in highly divergent clades (genetic branches).
However, most of the times this feature can be
explained by balancing selection. For instance,
estimates on the gene for red hair vary from 20,000
to 100,000 years ago[18][19], though there is no
compelling evidence to assume red hair didn't
coexist with other hair colours all along within one
and the same population. Moreover, Lalueza-Fox and
colleagues found a different variant of the same
gene in their Neanderthal samples, that similarly
disabled a protein to the same effect.[20]
Interbreeding
There is another hypothesis that the Neanderthals
were absorbed into the Cro-Magnon population by
interbreeding. This scenario would render the Recent
African Origin scenario obsolete in favour of a
hybrid-origin scenario, since it would imply that at
least a minor fraction of the genome of Europeans
would descend from Neanderthals, who had left Africa
at least 350,000 years ago. No evidence supporting
this scenario has been found in mtDNA analysis of
modern Europeans, suggesting at least that no direct
maternal line originating with Neanderthals has
survived into modern times.[21]
The most vocal proponent of the hybridization
hypothesis is Erik Trinkaus of Washington
University.[22] Trinkaus claims various fossils as
hybrid individuals, including the "child of Lagar
Velho", a skeleton found at Lagar Velho in Portugal
dated to about 24,000 years ago.[23] In a 2006
publication co-authored by Trinkaus, the fossils
found in 1952 in the cave of Pestera Muierii,
Romania, are likewise claimed as hybrids.[24]
Based on an Oxford University 2001 study of the gene
that results in red-headedness,[25] some
commentators speculated that Neanderthals had red
hair and that some red-headed and freckled humans
today share some heritage with Neanderthals.[26][27]
A 2007 study analysing Neanderthal DNA found that
some Neanderthals were indeed red-haired, but the
mutation to the MC1R gene which caused red hair in
Neanderthals was different from that found in modern
individuals, possibly ruling out that red hair is a
trait inherited from the Neanderthals.[28]
Unable to adapt
European populations of H. neanderthalensis have
been traditionally thought to be adapted to a cold
environment, and thus may have had problems adapting
to a warming environment. This may or may not be the
case, although it has been suggested that the
difference in cold-adaptation between Neanderthals
and H. sapiens may have been minor.
Another possibility has to do with the loss of the
Neanderthal's primary hunting territory - forests.
The Neanderthals hunted by stabbing their prey with
spears (as opposed to throwing the spears at their
prey). They were also far less mobile than modern
humans. Thus when the forests were gradually
replaced by flat lands, the Neanderthals would have
had great difficulty hunting. In the open they would
not have been able to stalk their prey, their
stabbing weapons would have been largely useless,
and they - unlike modern humans - could not easily
chase their prey. The heavily-set build of the
Neanderthals also suggests that they may have had
large energy requirements, therefore if their method
of hunting became less efficient (as described
above) the increased energy expenditure may have
been too much to sustain.
Division of labour
In 2006, anthropologists Steven L. Kuhn and Mary C.
Stiner of the University of Arizona proposed a new
explanation for the demise of the Neanderthals.[29]
In an article titled "What's a Mother to Do? The
Division of Labour among Neanderthals and Modern
Humans in Eurasia",[30] they theorise that
Neanderthals like Middle Palaeolithic Homo sapiens
did not have a division of labour between the sexes.
Both male and female Neanderthals participated in
the single main occupation of hunting big game that
flourished in Europe in the ice age like bison,
deer, gazelles and wild horses. This contrasted with
humans who were better able to use the resources of
the environment because of a division of labour with
the women going after small game and gathering plant
foods. In addition because big game hunting was so
dangerous this made humans, at least males, more
resilient (see also Peter Frost's theory on the
origins of European blond hair).
Anatomical differences and running ability
Researches including Karen L. Steudel of the
University of Wisconsin have proposed that because
Neanderthals had limbs that were shorter and
stockier than modern humans, and because of
anatomical differences in their limbs, it is
theorized that the primary reason the Neanderthals
were not able to survive is related to the fact that
they could not run as fast as modern humans, and
they would require 30% more energy than modern
humans would for running or walking. [15] This would
have given modern humans a huge advantage in battle.
Other researchers, like Yoel Rak, from Tel-Aviv
University, Israel have noted that the fossil
records show that Neanderthals pelvises in
comparison to modern human pelvises would have made
it much harder for Neanderthals to absorb shock and
to bounce off from one step to the next, giving
modern humans another advantage over Neanderthals in
running and walking ability. [16]
Neanderthals failed to adapt to the Ice Age
According to this hypothesis the inability to adapt
to climate change led to the Neandertals'
demise.[31][32] Not the cold, since both Cro Magnons
and Neandertals had clothing, but failure to adapt
their hunting methods caused their extinction when
Europe changed into a sparsely vegetated steppe and
half desert during the last Ice Age.
|
|
|
|
Notes |
-
^
Conard, N.J. et al. (2004) Unexpectedly recent
dates for human remains from Vogelherd. Nature
430, 198–201 [1]; [2]
-
^
[3] Inconsistencies in Neanderthal Genomic DNA
Sequences - Jeffrey D. Wall & Sung K. Kim,
published October 12, 2007 at PLOS Genetics;[4]
Analysis of one million base pairs of
Neanderthal DNA - Richard E. Green et al, Nature
444, 330-336, 16 November 2006;[5] Sequencing
and Analysis of Neanderthal Genomic DNA - James
P. Noonan et al, Science 17 November 2006: Vol.
314. no. 5802, pp. 1113 - 1118
-
^
[6] Rapid ecological turnover and its impact on
Neanderthal and other human populations - Clive
Finlayson and Jose´ S. Carrión, Trends in
Ecology & Evolution, Volume 22, Issue 4 , April
2007, Pages 213-222
-
^
Climate forcing and Neanderthal extinction in
Southern Iberia: insights from a multiproxy
marine record - Francisco J. Jiménez-Espejo,
Quaternary Science Reviews, Volume 26, Issues
7-8, April 2007, Pages 836-852, Elsevier Ltd
-
^
European early modern humans and the fate of the
Neandertals Erik Trinkaus; doi:
10.1073/pnas.0702214104 PNAS May 1, 2007 vol.
104 no. 18 7367-7372
-
^
Prideaux, Tom (1979), Cro-Magnon Man, Time-Life
Books, ISBN 0705400557
-
^
Lewin, Roger (1999), Human Evolution: An
Illustrated Introduction, Blackwell, ISBN
0632043091
-
^
The Evolution of Germs
-
^
Finlayson, C., F. G. Pacheco, J.
Rodriguez-Vidal, D. A. Fa, J. M. G. Lopez, A. S.
Perez, G. Finlayson, E. Allue, J. B. Preysler,
I. Caceres, J. S. Carrion, Y. F. Jalvo, C. P.
Gleed-Owen, F. J. J. Espejo, P. Lopez, J. A. L.
Saez, J. A. R. Cantal, A. S. Marco, F. G.
Guzman, K. Brown, N. Fuentes, C. A. Valarino, A.
Villalpando, C. B. Stringer, F. M. Ruiz, and T.
Sakamoto. 2006. Late survival of Neanderthals at
the southernmost extreme of Europe. Nature
advanced online publication.
-
^
Gravina, B., P. Mellars, and C. B. Ramsey. 2005.
Radiocarbon dating of interstratified
Neanderthal and early modern human occupations
at the Chatelperronian type-site. Nature
438:51-56.
-
^
Mellars, P. 2006. A new radiocarbon revolution
and the dispersal of modern humans in Eurasia.
Nature' 439:931-935.
-
^
Trinkaus, E. (2005) Early modern humans. Annu.
Rev. Anthropol. 34, 207–230 [7]
-
^
The early Upper Paleolithic human skeleton from
the Abrigo do Lagar Velho (Portugal) and modern
human emergence in Iberia - Cidália Duarte, João
Maurício, Paul B. Pettitt, Pedro Souto, Erik
Trinkaus, Hans van der Plicht, and João Zilhão,
PNAS Vol. 96, Issue 13, 7604-7609, June 22, 1999
[8]
-
^
[9]
-
^
Mekel-Bobrov, N., et al. (2007). "The ongoing
adaptive evolution of ASPM and Microcephalin is
not explained by increased intelligence". Hum.
Mol. Genet. 16: adv. access. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddl487.
PMID 17220170.
-
^
Evans, Patrick D.; et al. (2006-11-07).
"Evidence that the adaptive allele of the brain
size gene microcephalin introgressed into Homo
sapiens from an archaic Homo lineage". PNAS 10
(48): 18178–18183. doi:10.1073/pnas.0606966103.
PMID 17090677, http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/103/48/18178.
Retrieved on 26 May 2008.
-
^
Evans, Patrick D.; et al. (2005-09-09).
"Microcephalin, a Gene Regulating Brain Size,
Continues to Evolve Adaptively in Humans".
Science 309 (5741): 1717–1720.
doi:10.1126/science.1113722. PMID 16151009,
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/309/5741/1717.
-
^
Nicole's hair secrets Daily Telegraph
2002-10-02, Accessed 2005-11-02
-
^
Red hair genes 100,000 years old Oxford
Blueprint Vol. 1 Issue 11 2001-05-31
-
^
[10] A Melanocortin 1 Receptor Allele Suggests
Varying Pigmentation Among Neanderthals - Carles
Lalueza-Fox et al., Science. 2007 Oct 25
-
^
Krings et al., Neandertal DNA sequences and the
origin of modern humans Cell. 1997 Jul
11;90(1):19-30. Deborah Hill, [11]; No
Neandertals in the Gene Pool, Science (2004).
-
^
Dan Jones: The Neanderthal within., New
Scientist 193.2007, H. 2593 (3 March), 28–32.
Modern Humans, Neanderthals May Have Interbred;
Humans and Neanderthals interbred
-
^
[12]; [13]; [14]
-
^
Andrei Soficaru u. a.: Early modern humans from
Pestera Muierii, Baia de Fier, Romania. in:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Washington 2006.
-
^
Red hair a legacy of Neanderthal man
-
^
"Red-Heads and Neanderthals" (May 2001).
Retrieved on 2005-10-28.
-
^
"Nicole's hair secrets" (2002-02-10). Retrieved
on 2005-11-02.
-
^
Paul Rincon, Neanderthals 'were flame-haired'
BBC 25 October 2007.
-
^
Nicholas Wade, "Neanderthal Women Joined Men in
the Hunt", from The New York Times, December 5,
2006
-
^
Steven L. Kuhn and Mary C. Stiner, "What's a
Mother to Do? The Division of Labor among
Neandertals and Modern Humans in Eurasia",
Current Anthropology, Volume 47, Number 6,
December 2006
-
^
Climate Change Killed Neandertals, Study Says,
National Geographic News
-
^
Gilligan, I: "Neanderthal extinction and modern
human behaviour: the role of climate change and
clothing", World Archaeology, Vol. 39, No. 4.
(2007), pp. 499-514.
|
|
"Neanderthal extinction hypotheses" Wikipedia, The Free
Encyclopaedia. 22 July 2004, 10:55 UTC. Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc. 10 Aug. 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neandertal_interaction_with_Cro-Magnons
All
text is available under the terms of the Wikipedia - Text
of the GNU Free Documentation License |
|
|
|